The feminine Body in Margaret Atwood's The Ready-to-eat Woman and Lady Oracle Simply by Sofia Sanchez-Grant1 Abstract This kind of essay investigates scholarly discourses about agreement, and their raising scholarly currency, in relation to two novels by Canadian copy writer Margaret Atwood. Like most of Atwood's various other works, The Edible Woman (1969) and girl Oracle (1976) are clearly concerned with the complexities of body image. More specifically, however , these types of novels usefully exemplify her attempt to demystify the female kind. In the pursuing pages, We investigate Atwood's treatment of the mind/body dualism and evaluate the ways in which she responds to, and resists, their destructive results. Using modern-day theory, in addition, I present how Atwood deals with the concept of female space, as well as the вЂspace' of the feminine body alone. I contemplate Atwood's portrayal of the female appetite, taking into account its relationship to electricity and identity, and foregrounding the cultural meaning of eating disorders. Used together, these subject issues demonstrate how the body вЂfeeds' identity and exactly how a female's corporeal encounter directly influences her social experience. By using a close engagement with the latest theories of embodiment, I analyse the extent where Atwood's fictional works might take apart culturally-encoded principles of beauty and recommend a useful further to classic readings with the female human body in which the re-embodiment of the self is equated to a re-embodiment of lifestyle. Keywords: Feminism; embodiment; literary works In 1990, sociologist Arthur Frank reported: вЂBodies will be in, in academia in popular culture' (131). 3 years later, David Morgan and Sue Scott in their research Body Matters: Essays within the Sociology from the Body reaffirm his statement: вЂsince all of us first began the process of editing this book there is a veritable explosion of feminist work with " the bodyвЂќ' (3). Almost 20 years have elapsed since 1990, but the ongoing proliferation of scholarship structured around issues relating to your body means that Frank's assertion nonetheless rings true today. During your time on st. kitts are multiple explanations for what Kathy Davis has termed the вЂbody craze', it is ascribable, in no little way, to the work of feminism: вЂfeminism is held responsible for placing the body for the intellectual map' (1). Relegated to the realms of biology, the body provides, until just lately, been a web site of cultural debate largely ignored by simply sociologists. Hiding in the background of social science, this вЂabsent presence' was, and occasionally is, disparaged in favour of вЂthe mind'. 2 This mind/body dichotomy has pervaded western believed for centuries. Descartes' famous dictum, вЂCogito indem sum', established dualism as a distinct philosophy; however , the tradition dates back much further more and is deeply rooted in early
Sofia Sanchez-Grant is a graduate of the School of Aberdeen. This term, вЂabsent presence' has been followed by a range of sociologists to spell out the treatment of вЂthe body' inside the social savoir. Kathy Davis attributes the word to Chris Shilling. 93. The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage. 2
Journal of International Ladies Studies Volume. 9 #2 March 08
Christian theology. three or more Cartesian dualism partitions individual experience in two individual categories: the spiritual plus the bodily. With this equation, the body is merely a vessel intended for the rational, objective head. Susan Lado vividly captures this mind/body struggle in Unbearable Excess weight (2003): [W]hat remains the element... is the construction of body as something apart from the true personal (whether conceived as soul, mind, spirit, will, freedomвЂ¦) and as shorting the best efforts of that do it yourself. That which is usually not-body is the highest, the very best, the noblest, the closest to God; that which can be body is the albatross, the heavy fatigue self-realization. (5) This self/other dualism is likewise reflected in the made oppositions of culture and nature, and...
Cited: Atwood, Margaret. 2004. Lady Oracle. London: Virago Press. ---. 2004. The Edible Girl. London: Virago Press. Barzilai, Shuli. 2k. вЂ" Declare I Had a gorgeous FaceвЂќ: The Grimms' Rapunzel, Tennyson's Lady of Shalott, and Atwood's Lady Oracle'. Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature nineteen: 231-54. Lado, Susan. 2003. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Traditional western Culture and the Body. London: University of California Press, Ltd. Brook, Barbara. 99. Feminist Points of views on the Body. New York: Pearson Education Inc. Chernin, Kim. The Hungry Do it yourself: Women, Consuming and Id. London: Virago Press Ltd., 1986. ---. 1994. The Obsession: Glare on the Tyranny of Slenderness. New York: HarperPerennial. Conboy, Katie, et ing. Eds., 1997. Writing on the Body: Female Agreement and Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia College or university Press. Davis, Kathy. Education. 1997. Embodied Practices: Feminist Perspectives figure. London: Sage Publications. Fee, Margery. 93. The Fat Girl Dances: Maggie Atwood's Lady Oracle. Toronto: ECW Press. Frank, Arthur. 1990. вЂBringing Bodies In: A Decade Review'. Theory Traditions and Society 7: 131-62. Hite, Molly. 1992. The Other Side of the Account. New York: Cornell University Press. ---. вЂWriting-and Reading-the Body: Female Sexuality and Recent Feminist Fiction'. 1988. Feminist Studies 14: 120-42. Humm, Maggie. 1991. вЂGoing through the green channel: Margaret Atwood and Body Boundaries'. Border Visitors: Strategies of Modern-day Women Copy writers. Manchester: Stansted University Press: 123-15. Knutson, Stevi and Sue Jeff. 2001. вЂPutting the Body's Feet on the Ground: Toward a Sociological Reconceptualization of Gendered and Sexual Embodiment'. Constructing Gendered Bodies. Impotence. Kathryn Backett-Milburn et 's. New York: Palgrave: 7-23. Full, Jeannette. 2005. The Even victorian Woman Question in Modern-day Feminist Fictional. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Represents, Lara V., 2001. Lovemaking Chemistry: As well as of the Contraceptive Pill. Greater london: Yale School Press. eight Martin, Emily. 1993. Over in the Body. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Morgan, David and File suit Scott. Eds. 1993. Body system Matters: Documents on the Sociology of the Human body. London: The Falmer Press. Orbach, Susie. 1998. Excess fat is a Feminist Issue and its particular Sequel. London, uk: Arrow Ebooks. Palmer, Paulina. 1989. Modern day Women's Fictional: Narrative Practice and Feminist Theory. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Parker, Emma. 1995. вЂYou Are What You Eat: The Politics of Eating in the Novels of Margaret Atwood'. Twentieth Century Literature forty one: 349-69. Sanger, Margaret. 1988. вЂBirth Control вЂ“ A Parents' Issue or a Female's? ' (1922). The Feminist Papers: By Adams to de Beauvoir. Ed. Alice de Rossi. New York: Columbia University Press: 533. Shilling, Chris. 1993. The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage. Tuana, Nancy. 1993. The Less Rspectable Sex: Medical, Religious, and Philosophical
Journal of Intercontinental Women's Research Vol. 9 #2 Drive 2008
Conceptions of Woman's Nature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Williams, Bob J., and Gillian Bendelow. 1998. The Lived Body system: Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues. London: Routledge.
Journal of International Ladies Studies Volume. 9 #2 March 08